I need to clarify this fact because all the readers who are giving this book a 5-star review think they are learning some historical relevance about China, but really are only glimpsing a small fraction of people A visit from the footbinder essay are brought into this practice.
Whenever Westerners write about foot binding, they seem to perpetually assume that it was for all girls in the time period. The author most certainly has never heard of Mandarin Chinese. I have grandmothers and great grandmothers who were in no danger of ever getting forced into this bound foot business because they lived in the city and were educated.
Also, not all men were even into that.
Also, not all men were even into that Oh, goodness, another seemingly Chinese novel with supposedly historic details written by a white woman Buck was a legit white lady who wrote about Chinese culture.
Building upon the main downfall is one that really irked me throughout the entire book. She thinks she is getting away with it because her main protagonist is a Chinese native. Had Kathryn Harrison read anything remotely historically Chinese, she would have learned that the real foot emancipationist was Mao Ze Dong.
Jesus, just talk to a real Chinese person! This book gets one star for writing a mildly interesting section about the rubber trade and then a synthetic replacement.
I have no idea how accurate the sexual predilections this author wrote about are. Really, it was only very traditional, insular men back in that time period who thought deformed feet were hot. Any man with any sort of education or was raised in the city did not prefer bound feet at all.
It was communism that abolished foot binding, multiple wives practice and many degrading female practices that stemmed from Confucianism. She completely butchers all Chinese words in her novel! She freaking called the Huangpu River the Whangpoo. The Dick character is definitely the most likable despite that name.
May 10, Kathy Ding rated it did not like it Oh, goodness, another seemingly Chinese novel with supposedly historic details written by a white woman As for the story itself, she should have just focused on the main thread of the bound foot girl, but no, the author extends herself by creating all these unnecessary subplots and characters who nobody cared about.
It further convinces me that she did no research on what pinyin is and how to romanize Chinese words. Kathryn Harrison heaps insults upon insults not only about Shanghai, but extends it to the Chinese culture and the Chinese people as a whole.
I kid you not, she calls Chinese people less human than white people and instills this irrational hatred into the main character to despise all Chinese men as well since they are animalsOffbeat stories of women trying to transcend limitations imposed on them because of their sex and of men confused as a result focus on innocent depravity, absurd rituals, escapes from constraining lifestyles, and life's pleasures and fun.
- For the purpose of this essay, we will ascribe to a conception of “progress” that promotes equality in the realms of education, occupational opportunity, independence, geographic and marital freedom, property rights, and reproductive rights. The Binding Chair or, A Visit from the Foot Emancipation Society has 1, ratings and reviews.
Petra X said: The hook was the title - perhaps a glim /5. Open Document. Below is an essay on "A Visit From The Footbinder" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples/5(1). Below is an essay on "A Visit to the Orphanage" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.
It was a beautiful morning, Molly and I were attending our usual meeting of the Charity Club.
An Analysis of the Roles of Women During the Time That A Visit From the Footbinder PAGES 1. WORDS View Full Essay. Sign up to view the complete essay.
Show me the full essay. Show me the full essay. More essays like this: role of women, role of men, a visit from the footbinder.Download